So the short answer is, no. In particular, in my opinion, Parelli methods are futile and confusing to the horses, at best, and dangerous, at worst. I’m trying to figure out if the methods themselves are flawed or if it just attracts followers who are particularly inept at actually understanding how horses think. I’d like to meet PP and watch him teach, and ask him a few questions. . . .guess that won’t be happening.
I also am not a big Clinton Anderson fan, though undoubtedly he has geat success with certain types of horses. His methods would (and do) cause a lot of problems for many Thoroughbreds and Arabians, and horses with those types of temperaments, though.

I’ve worked with horses trained with both trainers’ methodologies, and they were sent to me bacause of problems which developed or were exacerbated by those particular training methods. I’ve only watched PP and CA on tv, and I can see where some of their techniques are causing problems with certain horses, even when done the way the trainers teach them to be done. Another one (almost no one has heard of) is Ryan Gingrich. He’s just very inexperienced with hands-on. I think he took some horse psychology courses in college. I’m not trying to be mean, just to give some honest evaluations, since you asked.

I’ll tell you who I do like, if you’re interested.
References :

The phrase "natural horsemanship" just sets of warning bells in my head though. There’s no such thing as "natural" when it comes to domestic animals. Nothing natural about a rope halter and a carrot stick… only way to let your horse be really natural is to never touch it!
References :