I’m curious to see what people generally prefer: traditional horse training methods or new "natural horsemanship"? And why do you prefer it? Are you open to new ways of thinking or do you consider the information currently available to be sufficient?
I’m thrilled with the response to this question so far. I believe good horsemanship is about common sense and shouldn’t be labelled "traditional" or "natural". While I try to keep things natural, many "natural" methods are traditional. Natural horsemanship has been around for centuries. It’s great to see that people are open minded and think about the methods being used. Do any of you think their is a benefit to learning about current marketed natural horsemanship (Parelli, Lyons, Roberts, etc)?
I thank everyone for their awesome answers! I didn’t expect such a mature response and sure didn’t expect the general consenus to be so very similar.
All the answers were soo good.
Thanks so much, guys!!!
The techniques known as ‘natural horsemanship‘, ‘intelligent horsemanship’, and ‘horse whispering’ are considered a modern approach, but their roots go back many hundreds of years. It is only because we can now access, and share, much information that certain individuals have made business oportunities (and fortunes) by giving them a title.
Such techniques can be very useful in emphasising certain aspects of communication with horses, for example the use of body language and encouraging owners to question their ethics when training their horses. On the other hand, as with other methods (e.g. the classical school), when it becomes fashionable and popular, it can become another unquestioned dogma. The result is that one traditional dogma is replaced with another, which may be equally inadequate for improving how we teach or have to do with horses.
There is no right or wrong method, so long as it influenced by using informed and reasoned descisions, and takes the horses best interests in to account.
‘Thinking horsepersonship’ is what I follow! It is forever being adjusted as I learn more, and takes in to account the personality of the horse I am working with at the time. Anyone who believes that their method is the only valid one, and needs no further questioning, is of no use to the horse, and has no right to consider themselves a horseman (or person), whatever the title.
EDIT: It heartens me to read all the above answers, and to know I am in good company with regard to individuals who think for themselves, rather than just stick to one method like it’s a religion!